1. Text: | Print|

      Ma defends cross-Straits trade pact

      2014-03-24 08:47 Global Times Web Editor: Gu Liping
      1

      Taiwan leader Ma Ying-jeou on Sunday defended the cross-Straits service trade pact and urged protesters to halt their occupation of the legislative chamber in Taipei.

      Around 2,000 people stormed the authority's administrative chamber late Sunday as student protesters vowed to extend the occupation of administration buildings. Eight were injured in the conflict between protesters and police, local TV station Cti TV reported. Police pledged to end the protest and take back the building Sunday.

      Speaking to reporters in Taipei earlier Sunday, Ma said that Taiwan would suffer economically if it did not sign the agreement.

      "Taiwan is in urgent need of more free trade agreements as its economy relies heavily on foreign trade and failure to pass the trade agreement would not only damage Taiwan's credentials in the world but also hurt cross-Straits relations," Ma noted, adding that the ruling Kuomintang party (KMT) has agreed with student demands of a clause-by-clause review and ballots.

      Some 400 protesters, mostly young students, broke through security barriers and took over the legislative chamber on Tuesday, the first such occupation in the island's history.

      Ma called the occupation a violation of the law, and said the students have affected the authority's work and should withdraw.

      "Are we not proud of Taiwan's democracy and rule of law?" Ma said. "If there is no rule of law, democracy cannot be protected. This is the government's unswerving basic position," Ma said.

      Ma and the KMT have promoted the pact, which faces final review on April 8, as necessary to maintain Taiwan's competitiveness and status as an export powerhouse.

      They called it a precondition for Taiwan to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a wide-ranging trade deal spearheaded by the US.

      However, protesters still demanded a rejection of the agreement claiming the pact might leave Taiwan vulnerable to political pressure from the Chinese mainland.

      "Although the agreement might benefit Taiwan's economy in the short term, our independent economy may be put under control of the mainland in return. It also risks all kinds of hidden rules and administrative approvals from the mainland," said Hong Chih-kun, a member of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) central executive committee.

      Approval of the pact would pave the way for greater economic integration, by opening 80 of the mainland's service sectors to Taiwan and 64 Taiwan sectors to mainland businesses.

      "Taiwan could have revived its economy in cooperation with the rapid economic development of the mainland. Economic cooperation would then take the lead in advancing cross-Straits relations," Li He, a deputy director of the Beijing-based National Society of Taiwan Studies, told the Global Times.

      Li noted that it is abnormal to see such an occupation in a democratic society, which reflects populism instead of democracy. He believed that it reflects the anti-mainland ideology of Taiwan residents, which is a result of long-term misleading policies against the mainland.

      While protesters hailed their freedom of expression under democracy, the occupation was criticized by many for being chaotic and irrational.

      Previous media reports revealed that some student protestors had been drinking and partying inside the legislative chamber.

      Others voiced concerns that reflected a lack of understanding of the pact.

      An anonymous protester reached by the Global Times said she is worried that "mainland investors might take away job opportunities of future generations."

      "Many students are irrational in responding to the agreement. They are faced with an unsatisfying job market and they don't realize that the agreement could create more jobs for them. Young people tend to be rebellious and are easily incited by the DPP," said Hu Benliang, an associate research fellow with the Institute of Taiwan Studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

      Agencies contributed to this story

      Comments (0)
      Most popular in 24h
        Archived Content
      Media partners:

      Copyright ©1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
      Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

      主站蜘蛛池模板: 卡1卡2卡3卡4卡5免费视频| 毛片免费在线播放| 亚洲精品无码专区在线在线播放 | 亚洲国产精品无码专区影院| 无码AV动漫精品一区二区免费| 亚洲av日韩av欧v在线天堂| 国产亚洲视频在线| 亚洲日本韩国在线| 国产精品黄页免费高清在线观看| 成人A毛片免费观看网站| 国产日韩成人亚洲丁香婷婷| caoporm超免费公开视频| 亚洲午夜久久久久久久久久| 少妇性饥渴无码A区免费| 午夜亚洲www湿好大| 亚洲一区免费在线观看| 中文字幕亚洲精品无码| 国产免费黄色大片| 毛片基地看看成人免费| 亚洲视频日韩视频| 女人18毛片特级一级免费视频| 国产精品无码亚洲一区二区三区 | 久久亚洲国产欧洲精品一| 久久99精品免费视频| 亚洲国产成人九九综合| 日韩人妻无码免费视频一区二区三区 | 亚洲视频在线免费| 亚洲人成网站影音先锋播放| 黄瓜视频影院在线观看免费| 18禁亚洲深夜福利人口| 亚洲色成人网站WWW永久| 亚欧在线精品免费观看一区| 亚洲av成人无码网站…| 日本亚洲视频在线| 在线观看人成视频免费| 久久国产一片免费观看| 亚洲av片不卡无码久久| 亚洲一区二区三区国产精品| 57pao一国产成视频永久免费| 亚洲AV一区二区三区四区| 亚洲国产成人片在线观看无码 |