1. Text: | Print|

      Ma defends cross-Straits trade pact

      2014-03-24 08:47 Global Times Web Editor: Gu Liping
      1

      Taiwan leader Ma Ying-jeou on Sunday defended the cross-Straits service trade pact and urged protesters to halt their occupation of the legislative chamber in Taipei.

      Around 2,000 people stormed the authority's administrative chamber late Sunday as student protesters vowed to extend the occupation of administration buildings. Eight were injured in the conflict between protesters and police, local TV station Cti TV reported. Police pledged to end the protest and take back the building Sunday.

      Speaking to reporters in Taipei earlier Sunday, Ma said that Taiwan would suffer economically if it did not sign the agreement.

      "Taiwan is in urgent need of more free trade agreements as its economy relies heavily on foreign trade and failure to pass the trade agreement would not only damage Taiwan's credentials in the world but also hurt cross-Straits relations," Ma noted, adding that the ruling Kuomintang party (KMT) has agreed with student demands of a clause-by-clause review and ballots.

      Some 400 protesters, mostly young students, broke through security barriers and took over the legislative chamber on Tuesday, the first such occupation in the island's history.

      Ma called the occupation a violation of the law, and said the students have affected the authority's work and should withdraw.

      "Are we not proud of Taiwan's democracy and rule of law?" Ma said. "If there is no rule of law, democracy cannot be protected. This is the government's unswerving basic position," Ma said.

      Ma and the KMT have promoted the pact, which faces final review on April 8, as necessary to maintain Taiwan's competitiveness and status as an export powerhouse.

      They called it a precondition for Taiwan to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a wide-ranging trade deal spearheaded by the US.

      However, protesters still demanded a rejection of the agreement claiming the pact might leave Taiwan vulnerable to political pressure from the Chinese mainland.

      "Although the agreement might benefit Taiwan's economy in the short term, our independent economy may be put under control of the mainland in return. It also risks all kinds of hidden rules and administrative approvals from the mainland," said Hong Chih-kun, a member of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) central executive committee.

      Approval of the pact would pave the way for greater economic integration, by opening 80 of the mainland's service sectors to Taiwan and 64 Taiwan sectors to mainland businesses.

      "Taiwan could have revived its economy in cooperation with the rapid economic development of the mainland. Economic cooperation would then take the lead in advancing cross-Straits relations," Li He, a deputy director of the Beijing-based National Society of Taiwan Studies, told the Global Times.

      Li noted that it is abnormal to see such an occupation in a democratic society, which reflects populism instead of democracy. He believed that it reflects the anti-mainland ideology of Taiwan residents, which is a result of long-term misleading policies against the mainland.

      While protesters hailed their freedom of expression under democracy, the occupation was criticized by many for being chaotic and irrational.

      Previous media reports revealed that some student protestors had been drinking and partying inside the legislative chamber.

      Others voiced concerns that reflected a lack of understanding of the pact.

      An anonymous protester reached by the Global Times said she is worried that "mainland investors might take away job opportunities of future generations."

      "Many students are irrational in responding to the agreement. They are faced with an unsatisfying job market and they don't realize that the agreement could create more jobs for them. Young people tend to be rebellious and are easily incited by the DPP," said Hu Benliang, an associate research fellow with the Institute of Taiwan Studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

      Agencies contributed to this story

      Comments (0)
      Most popular in 24h
        Archived Content
      Media partners:

      Copyright ©1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
      Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

      主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久精品成人免费国产片小草 | 亚洲精品美女久久久久久久| 亚洲视频在线观看网站| 亚洲AV无码第一区二区三区| 亚洲综合av永久无码精品一区二区 | 亚洲av乱码一区二区三区| 亚洲a视频在线观看| 亚洲午夜无码久久| 亚洲av日韩av永久在线观看 | 亚洲一区二区成人| 亚洲高清中文字幕| 91亚洲精品麻豆| 99久久婷婷国产综合亚洲| 亚洲人片在线观看天堂无码| 亚洲国产精品网站在线播放 | 亚洲av产在线精品亚洲第一站| 亚洲精品伊人久久久久| 亚洲熟妇丰满xxxxx| 免费精品国自产拍在线播放| 国产真人无码作爱免费视频| 久久午夜夜伦鲁鲁片无码免费| 91精品国产免费入口| 毛片a级毛片免费观看免下载| 日本无吗免费一二区| 亚洲成a人片在线观看日本麻豆| 在线A亚洲老鸭窝天堂| 亚洲国产高清视频| 中文字幕亚洲男人的天堂网络| 亚洲AV无码一区二区三区久久精品 | 亚洲videos| 国产亚洲视频在线观看| 国产免费内射又粗又爽密桃视频| 久久这里只精品热免费99| 亚洲视频在线免费播放| 日韩高清免费在线观看| AV在线播放日韩亚洲欧| 亚洲精品免费在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩中文高清www777| 无码精品人妻一区二区三区免费| 国产免费爽爽视频在线观看| 99无码人妻一区二区三区免费|