1. LINE

      Text:AAAPrint
      Society

      Over 20,000 people sign open letter against South China Sea arbitration award

      1
      2016-07-13 09:15Xinhua Editor: Gu Liping

      Over 20,000 people have signed an open letter contesting the award on the South China Sea (SCS) arbitration case by an ad hoc tribunal on Tuesday.

      The 2,500-word letter, drafted by a group of young Chinese scholars who currently study international law in the Netherlands, slams the controversial case unilaterally initiated by the Philippines for its lack of legality, noting that the arbitral decision violated the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

      Shortly after the tribunal issued the award, the scholars sent the letter to the Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea under the United Nations (UN) Office of Legal Affairs, and required the institution to forward it to all parties of the UNCLOS.

      Copies of the letter were also sent to international judicial and arbitral organs, such as the International Criminal Court, the Permanent Court of Arbitration and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, as well as major law schools across the world.

      The letter has been posted online and circulated on social media platforms, inviting people to participate and show solidarity against the ungrounded ruling. It has collected over 20,000 signatures in less than two hours.

      Many law schools have voiced support for the letter and retweeted it on their official social media accounts.

      The letter criticizes the tribunal for ignoring the nature of the SCS disputes, and ruling on a case that it has no jurisdiction over.

      "The real disputes in the arbitration are those regarding territory and maritime delimitation," it says. "With respect to the jurisdiction, the UNCLOS does not address territorial disputes, and delimitation disputes have been excluded from compulsory procedures by China's declaration under Article 298."

      Therefore, the case demonstrates how the legal process is abused by one party to the dispute, and how the arbitral organ acts beyond its power, according to the letter.

      "By obscuring the real disputes and bypassing the limits to compulsory procedures, the Philippines does abuse the legal process, the tribunal does exceed the state consent and act ultra vires (acts beyond one's legal power or authority)," the letter says. "According to Article 296 (of the UNCLOS), the awards on jurisdiction and on merits will have no binding force whatsoever."

      In conclusion, the letter requests international judicial and arbitral organs to act strictly within their mandate under international law, calls on all parties to the UNCLOS to join China in the efforts to combat abuse of legal process, and invites scholars, students and lawyers to further study the UNCLOS disputes settlement mechanism so as to contribute to a peaceful settlement of SCS disputes.

      Among 8,000-more Chinese students studying in the Netherlands, over 100 are in faculties of law across the country. Those specializing in international law and the Law of the Sea set up a research group for the drafting of the open letter.

      "We cannot believe that such a bizarre case was able to keep advancing in The Hague, capital of international law," said Peng Qinxuan, 29, PhD candidate of international law at Utrecht University and active member of the group.

      "In this case, the arbitrators failed to see the wood for the trees. But we scholars of international law have the duty to present the truth," she said.

      Peng and her peers spent three months drafting the letter in English and translating it into Chinese and Dutch.

      "In my six years of life in the Netherlands, I have noticed that the Western media coverage on China is full of bias and there is no exception when it comes to the arbitration," said Wang Zhili, a candidate for master degree from the Ultrecht University who also participated in circulating the open letter.

      "In-depth articles with a neutral stance over the issue are really hard to find. That's why we decided to post the letter online," Wang added.

        

      Related news

      MorePhoto

      Most popular in 24h

      MoreTop news

      MoreVideo

      News
      Politics
      Business
      Society
      Culture
      Military
      Sci-tech
      Entertainment
      Sports
      Odd
      Features
      Biz
      Economy
      Travel
      Travel News
      Travel Types
      Events
      Food
      Hotel
      Bar & Club
      Architecture
      Gallery
      Photo
      CNS Photo
      Video
      Video
      Learning Chinese
      Learn About China
      Social Chinese
      Business Chinese
      Buzz Words
      Bilingual
      Resources
      ECNS Wire
      Special Coverage
      Infographics
      Voices
      LINE
      Back to top Links | About Us | Jobs | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
      Copyright ©1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
      Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
      主站蜘蛛池模板: 黄页网站在线免费观看| 亚洲免费黄色网址| 精品一区二区三区免费毛片| 99久久综合国产精品免费| 亚洲喷奶水中文字幕电影 | 亚洲AV网站在线观看| 国产精品高清视亚洲一区二区| 国产免费一区二区三区| 亚洲ts人妖网站| 成年私人影院免费视频网站| 亚洲丰满熟女一区二区哦| 国产一区二区三区在线免费观看| 色欲aⅴ亚洲情无码AV| 四虎永久成人免费| www一区二区www免费| 亚洲人成精品久久久久| 日本免费高清视频| 亚洲白嫩在线观看| 免费黄色网址入口| 一区二区3区免费视频| 久久精品国产亚洲AV麻豆不卡 | 色www永久免费视频| 看全免费的一级毛片| 亚洲伊人久久成综合人影院| 99精品视频免费| 亚洲图片中文字幕| 在线看片无码永久免费aⅴ| 日韩在线观看视频免费| 国产亚洲精品xxx| 无码少妇一区二区浪潮免费| 久久亚洲AV成人无码国产电影| 久久久久噜噜噜亚洲熟女综合| 日韩精品免费在线视频| 亚洲不卡影院午夜在线观看| 免费在线观看黄网站| 久久久久国产精品免费免费不卡| 波多野结衣亚洲一级| 国产亚洲精品a在线观看| 最近免费中文字幕mv电影| 久久精品国产亚洲av品善| 亚洲乱码国产乱码精品精|