1. Friday May 25, 2018
      Home > BUSINESS
      Text:| Print|

      Apple moves to defend rights on iconic iPad

      2012-02-22 14:00 China Daily     Web Editor: Zhang Chan comment

      The latest round in the legal wrangle over rights to the iPad name in China is scheduled for Feb 29 in Guangdong provincial high court as Apple Inc appeals a lower court ruling that favored cash-strapped Proview Technology.

      In December, a Shenzhen court ruled that LED maker Preview Technology, also based in Shenzhen, has a valid trademark on the iconic iPad name in China.

      In its first public comment on the dispute, Apple released a brief statement on Feb 16, claiming it paid for the rights long ago.

      "We bought Proview's worldwide rights to the iPad trademark in 10 different countries several years ago," the statement said. "Proview refuses to honor the agreement and a Hong Kong judge has sided with Apple in this matter."

      The rare announcement reflects the growing pressure on Apple from recent investigations by local administrations, industry watchers said.

      Hong Kong Judge Hon Poon issued an injunction in July preventing Proview from transferring or selling the iPad trademark, noting Proview and its CEO Yang Rongshan "have refused to take any steps to ensure compliance so the China trademarks are properly assigned or transferred (to Apple)", according to tech news portal All Things D.

      The Hong Kong court has yet to fully hear the case, said Ma Dongxiao, an attorney for Proview.

      "We just went through some preliminary procedures," he said.

      Yet "the injunction reflects the judge's position on the case", Ma Qiang, a counsel of Jun He Law Offices, told China Daily. He predicted the final verdict in Hong Kong is likely to favor Apple.

      In response to the injunction, Proview Technology, a subsidiary of Proview International Holdings Ltd in Hong Kong, held a press conference in Beijing last week to refute Apple's claims.

      "We feel wronged," CEO Yang told the press.

      He said his company invested $30 million in developing an "Ifamily" series in 1998 that included an IPAD, which stands for Internet personal access device. The products were sold in the United States, Mexico, Brazil and other countries, he added.

      In 2009, an Apple subsidiary in the United Kingdom bought the worldwide iPad trademark rights from another Proview affiliate, Proview Electronics in Taiwan.

      While the global deal included the trademark, Proview Technology insists it is still the owner of the mark on the Chinese mainland and Proview Electronics was not authorized to sell it.

      Xie Xianghui, another attorney representing Proview Technology, said there is no direct equity relationship between the Shenzhen and Taiwan firms, so the deal is not binding on the Chinese mainland.

      Even if that is true, Proview's business structure could be used to prove agency relations between the two companies, legal experts said.

      But when Apple bought the trademark from Proview, it might not have filed documents with industry and commerce authorities that are needed to transfer ownership on the Chinese mainland.

      An application with signatures of both the parties to the deal is a key part of the process, said independent lawyer Ma Qiang.

      "The absence of the application may foreshadow conflicts in the future," he noted.

      But the complaints have targeted Apple's distributors rather than computer giant itself, said Proview attorney Ma Dongxiao.

      Proview has not claimed significant compensation other than in a Shanghai court, where it asked for 100,000 yuan ($15,872) to cover legal fees.

      Li Su, Proview's litigation counsel, told Tech.qq.com that the insolvent company's eight creditor banks would agree to settle the dispute if Apple could offer $400 million.

      "For a lower price, we need to negotiate," Li said.

      Li Shunde, deputy director of the Intellectual Property Center at the China Academy of Social Sciences, said Proview would be hard pressed to prove claims for compensation - even if courts recognize the infringement - since its products proved unsuccessful on the market before Apple developed the iPad.

      The value of a trademark is to help consumers distinguish between products, and in Proview's case against Apple, there is no confusion between products, Li said.

      At the request of Proview, many local administrations of industry and commerce have begun to investigate the case, but Li cautioned them to be "prudent".

      "Generally speaking, administrative penalties are involved when infringements are clear and no doubt exists," the professor said.

      "Yet in this case, after Apple has lodged an appeal, the ruling of the Shenzhen court has not came into effect," he noted. "In the absence of an effective court ruling, enforcement officials need more prudence.

      "After all, the dispute is not about misleading consumers, and a government agency should serve the public interest rather than disputes involving individual companies," he said.

      Comments (0)

      Copyright ©1999-2011 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
      Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

      主站蜘蛛池模板: 成人国产精品免费视频| 亚洲av最新在线观看网址| 国产大片免费天天看| 日本媚薬痉挛在线观看免费| 成人亚洲国产va天堂| 在线天堂免费观看.WWW| 亚洲成人网在线播放| 国产福利视精品永久免费| 亚洲精品mv在线观看| 免费在线观看h片| 亚洲国产片在线观看| 黄色片在线免费观看| 亚洲最大av资源站无码av网址| 亚洲一区二区三区免费视频| 亚洲国产精品久久人人爱| 0588影视手机免费看片| 亚洲一级毛片免费在线观看| 欧美男同gv免费网站观看| 亚洲老熟女五十路老熟女bbw| 日本大片在线看黄a∨免费| 妇女自拍偷自拍亚洲精品| 亚洲福利视频一区二区| 国产裸体美女永久免费无遮挡| 亚洲日本一区二区三区在线| 亚洲视频免费在线观看| wwwxxx亚洲| 婷婷综合缴情亚洲狠狠尤物| 9i9精品国产免费久久| 亚洲精品第五页中文字幕| 福利免费观看午夜体检区| 日韩少妇内射免费播放| 久久久久久久综合日本亚洲| 亚洲一级毛片免费观看| 亚洲丁香婷婷综合久久| 亚洲日本中文字幕一区二区三区| 国产色无码精品视频免费| 亚洲一区二区三区丝袜| 亚洲日韩在线中文字幕第一页 | 久久久亚洲AV波多野结衣| 毛片A级毛片免费播放| 免费精品视频在线|