1. Text: | Print|

      Silk Road, Marshall Plan comparisons unwise

      2014-11-24 08:53 Global Times Web Editor: Qin Dexing
      1

      A knowledge of history is important to understand current politics. It also often functions as an example for leaders shaping their decisions. But the main requirement for benefiting from history is its wise and prudent use.

      Only careful historical views can provide an antidote to present myopia. By contrast, the misuse of history leads to a distortion of information and uncomfortable misunderstandings.

      A recent example, which draws on the use and misuse of history, is related to the ongoing comparison of China's attempt to revitalize the ancient Silk Road with the US' decision to provide economic and military assistance to countries of Western Europe after WWII.

      In particular, some scholars endeavor these days to find a parallel between the European Recovery Program, widely known as Marshall Plan of 1947, and the "One Belt and One Road" initiative, namely, the Silk Road economic belt and the 21st century Maritime Silk Road.

      To compare these two projects, an analysis of two different speeches is required. The first was given by former US secretary of state George Marshall in June 1947 at Harvard University. The second was given by Chinese President Xi Jinping in September 2013 at Kazakhstan's Nazarbayev University.

      Marshall spoke on the necessary rehabilitation of Europe. As he specifically said: "The truth of the matter is that Europe's requirements for the next three or four years of foreign food and other essential products - principally from America - are so much greater than her present ability to pay that she must have substantial additional help, or face economic, social and political deterioration of a very grave character."

      The amount to be provided to European nations amounted, at that time, to $13 billion. A few months earlier, in March 1947 the US had already decided to directly assist Greece and Turkey.

      In his speech, Xi focused on China's policy of good-neighborly and friendly cooperation with countries of Central Asia. By laying the emphasis on history, he excluded the scenario of Beijing creating spheres of influence in Central Asia and elaborated on the concept of collaboration, peace and common prosperity.

      Xi also shared his hope for better policy communication and living conditions, infrastructure works, efficient transportation and monetary circulation. In that regard, he referred to the central role of China in providing aid by creating a fund worth of $40 billion.

      The speeches of both Marshall and Xi can be certainly connected due to their common reference to the commitment of both the US and China to support other countries. A fundamental difference, however, is evident. It is related to the context the speeches were given.

      On one hand, the Marshall Plan was part of Washington's attempts to contain the expansionism of Soviet Union and prevent Western Europe from falling into communism.

      On the other hand, the "One Belt and One Road" initiative will be undertaken in a period in which the world is becoming highly multipolar.

      In other words, the Cold World bipolar structure finds no resonance in today's era. In parallel with this, the confrontation between the US and the Soviet Union has no analogy nowadays.

      Although some scholars in the West suspiciously interpret the rise of China and predict some tensions with Washington in the future, a larger number of analysts remember the parameters of globalization and economic interdependence and cautiously warn of the risk of a mutually asserted destruction in the case of serious conflicts in the 21st century.

      All in all, Xi gave his speech at Kazakhstan's Nazarbayev University without denoting the existence of an opponent in the international arena. This does not of course mean that the Chinese leader should refrain from proposing and implementing plans that can strengthen the international position of China in the globalized era. This is how the "One Belt and One Road" initiative might be better understood.

      A comparison between the Marshall Plan and the "One Belt and One Road" project offers food for interesting observations regarding the new world order of the 21st century and international relations in general. More importantly, it stresses the need to efficiently study and teach history. This cannot be achieved if context and different circumstances are ignored.

      Comments (0)
      Most popular in 24h
        Archived Content
      Media partners:

      Copyright ©1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
      Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

      主站蜘蛛池模板: 老汉精品免费AV在线播放| 亚洲一欧洲中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品永久在线观看| 亚洲乱码国产乱码精华| 国产成人福利免费视频| 大胆亚洲人体视频| 91大神亚洲影视在线| 黄色一级免费网站| 全黄性性激高免费视频| 久久亚洲精精品中文字幕| 日本高清高色视频免费| 国产精品久久久久影院免费| 亚洲精品宾馆在线精品酒店| 手机看片久久国产免费| 亚洲黄色片免费看| 性短视频在线观看免费不卡流畅| 亚洲视频无码高清在线| 免费视频中文字幕| 免费人成视频在线观看免费| 亚洲午夜久久久久妓女影院| 国产免费av一区二区三区| 麻豆va在线精品免费播放| 亚洲第一黄色网址| 精品国产呦系列在线观看免费 | 亚洲成A人片在线观看无码不卡| 亚洲AV电影院在线观看| 蜜桃传媒一区二区亚洲AV| mm1313亚洲国产精品美女| 三年片在线观看免费| 亚洲国产理论片在线播放| 精品一区二区三区高清免费观看 | 久久www免费人成精品香蕉| 亚洲日韩aⅴ在线视频| 曰批视频免费40分钟试看天天| 久久久久亚洲AV成人网| 亚欧日韩毛片在线看免费网站| 亚洲人成网站色在线观看| 亚洲av再在线观看| 5555在线播放免费播放| 日韩欧美亚洲中文乱码| 亚洲不卡av不卡一区二区|