1. Text: | Print|

      Will robot revolution crimp value of human output?

      2014-11-26 14:15 China Daily Web Editor: Qin Dexing
      1

      Those whom machines cannot replace have most at stake

      For decades, people have been predicting how the rise of advanced computing and robotic technologies will affect our lives. On one side, there are warnings that robots will displace humans in the economy, destroying livelihoods, especially for low-skill workers. Others look forward to the vast economic opportunities that robots will present, claiming, for example, that they will improve productivity or take on undesirable jobs. The venture capitalist Peter Thiel, who recently joined the debate, falls into the latter camp, asserting that robots will save us from a future of high prices and low wages.

      Figuring out which side is right requires, first and foremost, an understanding of the six ways that humans have historically created value: through our legs, our fingers, our mouths, our brains, our smiles and our minds. Our legs and other large muscles move things to where we need them to be, so our fingers can rearrange them into useful patterns. Our brains regulate routine activities, keeping the leg- and finger-work on track. Our mouths - indeed, our words, whether spoken or written - enable us to inform and entertain one another. Our smiles help us to connect with others, ensuring that we pull roughly in the same direction. Finally, our minds - our curiosity and creativity - identify and resolve important and interesting challenges.

      Thiel, for his part, refutes the argument - often made by robot doomsayers - that the impact of artificial intelligence and advanced robotics on the labor force will mirror globalization's impact on advanced-country workers. Globalization hurt lower-skill workers in places like the US, as it enabled people from faraway countries to compete for the leg-and-finger positions in the global division of labor. Given that these new competitors demanded lower wages, they were the obvious choice for many companies.

      According to Thiel, the key difference between this phenomenon and the rise of robots lies in consumption. Developing-country workers took advantage of the bargaining power that globalization afforded them to gain resources for their own consumption. Computers and robots, by contrast, do not consume anything except electricity, even as they complete leg, finger, and even brain activities faster and more efficiently than humans would.

      Here, Thiel offers an example from his experience as CEO of PayPal. Instead of having humans scrutinize every item in every batch of 1,000,000 transactions for indications of fraud, PayPal's computers can approve the obviously legitimate transactions, and pass on the 1,000 or so that could be fraudulent for thoughtful consideration by a human. One worker and a computer system can thus do what PayPal would have had to hire 1,000 workers to do a generation ago. Given that the computer system does not need things like food, that thousand-fold increase in productivity will redound entirely to the benefit of the middle class.

      Put another way, globalization lowered the wages of low-skill advanced-country workers because others would perform their jobs more cheaply, and then consume the value that they had created. Computers mean that higher-skill workers - and the lower-skill workers who remain to oversee the large robotic factories and warehouses - can spend their time on more valuable activities, assisted by computers that demand little.

      Thiel's argument may be correct. But it is far from airtight.

      In fact, Thiel seems to be running into the old diamonds-and-water paradox - water is essential, but costs nothing, whereas diamonds are virtually useless, but extremely expensive - albeit in a sophisticated and subtle way. The paradox exists because, in a market economy, the value of water is set not by the total usefulness of water (infinite) or by the average usefulness of water (very large), but by the marginal value of the last drop of water consumed (very low).

      Similarly, the wages and salaries of low- and high-skill workers in the robot-computer economy of the future will not be determined by the (very high) productivity of the one lower-skill worker ensuring that all of the robots are in their places or the one high-skill worker reprogramming the software. Instead, compensation will reflect what workers outside the highly productive computer-robot economy are creating and earning.

      The newly industrialized city of Manchester had the highest level of labor productivity the world had ever seen. But the factory workers' wages were set not by their extraordinary productivity, but by what they would earn if they returned to the potato fields of pre-famine Ireland.

      So the question is not whether robots and computers will make human labor in the goods, high-tech services, and information-producing sectors infinitely more productive. They will. What really matters is whether the jobs outside of the robot-computer economy - jobs involving people's mouths, smiles, and minds - remain valuable and in high demand.

      From 1850 to 1970 or so, rapid technological progress first triggered wage increases in line with productivity gains. Then came the protracted process of income-distribution equalization, as machines, installed to substitute for human legs, and fingers created more jobs in machine-minding, which used human brains and mouths, than it destroyed in sectors requiring routine muscle power or dexterity work. And rising real incomes increased leisure time, thereby boosting demand for smiles and the products of minds.

      Will the same occur when machines take over routine brainwork? Maybe. But it is far from being a safe bet on which to rest an entire argument, as Thiel has.

      The author  J. Bradford DeLong is a former deputy assistant secretary of the US Treasury.

      Comments (0)
      Most popular in 24h
        Archived Content
      Media partners:

      Copyright ©1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
      Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

      主站蜘蛛池模板: 免费在线观看亚洲| 免费在线观看黄色毛片| 激情综合色五月丁香六月亚洲| 亚洲国产一级在线观看| 国产亚洲成AV人片在线观黄桃 | 中文字幕的电影免费网站| 久久免费公开视频| 在线观看成人免费视频| 国产亚洲美女精品久久久| 亚洲乱码中文字幕小综合| 亚洲AV色无码乱码在线观看| jizz中国免费| 影音先锋在线免费观看| 亚洲av无码专区亚洲av不卡| 亚洲国产91精品无码专区| 亚洲专区中文字幕| 国内精品久久久久影院免费| 青青青国产免费一夜七次郎| 久久久无码精品亚洲日韩蜜桃| 亚洲av永久无码精品网址| 免费v片在线观看无遮挡| 免费萌白酱国产一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品精品国产亚洲综合| 成人免费无码H在线观看不卡| 亚洲一区二区三区日本久久九| 国产精品亚洲精品久久精品| 成人黄色免费网站| 亚洲人成人无码网www电影首页 | 亚洲免费中文字幕| 国产麻豆免费观看91| 久久久精品国产亚洲成人满18免费网站 | 青青青亚洲精品国产| 91麻豆国产自产在线观看亚洲| 美丽姑娘免费观看在线观看中文版 | 亚洲综合区小说区激情区| 美女被吸屁股免费网站| 国产免费久久精品99re丫y| 日韩亚洲Av人人夜夜澡人人爽 | 亚洲国产成人久久综合区| 一区二区三区在线免费看| 亚洲AV永久无码精品一百度影院|