1. Text: | Print|

      Will robot revolution crimp value of human output?

      2014-11-26 14:15 China Daily Web Editor: Qin Dexing
      1

      Those whom machines cannot replace have most at stake

      For decades, people have been predicting how the rise of advanced computing and robotic technologies will affect our lives. On one side, there are warnings that robots will displace humans in the economy, destroying livelihoods, especially for low-skill workers. Others look forward to the vast economic opportunities that robots will present, claiming, for example, that they will improve productivity or take on undesirable jobs. The venture capitalist Peter Thiel, who recently joined the debate, falls into the latter camp, asserting that robots will save us from a future of high prices and low wages.

      Figuring out which side is right requires, first and foremost, an understanding of the six ways that humans have historically created value: through our legs, our fingers, our mouths, our brains, our smiles and our minds. Our legs and other large muscles move things to where we need them to be, so our fingers can rearrange them into useful patterns. Our brains regulate routine activities, keeping the leg- and finger-work on track. Our mouths - indeed, our words, whether spoken or written - enable us to inform and entertain one another. Our smiles help us to connect with others, ensuring that we pull roughly in the same direction. Finally, our minds - our curiosity and creativity - identify and resolve important and interesting challenges.

      Thiel, for his part, refutes the argument - often made by robot doomsayers - that the impact of artificial intelligence and advanced robotics on the labor force will mirror globalization's impact on advanced-country workers. Globalization hurt lower-skill workers in places like the US, as it enabled people from faraway countries to compete for the leg-and-finger positions in the global division of labor. Given that these new competitors demanded lower wages, they were the obvious choice for many companies.

      According to Thiel, the key difference between this phenomenon and the rise of robots lies in consumption. Developing-country workers took advantage of the bargaining power that globalization afforded them to gain resources for their own consumption. Computers and robots, by contrast, do not consume anything except electricity, even as they complete leg, finger, and even brain activities faster and more efficiently than humans would.

      Here, Thiel offers an example from his experience as CEO of PayPal. Instead of having humans scrutinize every item in every batch of 1,000,000 transactions for indications of fraud, PayPal's computers can approve the obviously legitimate transactions, and pass on the 1,000 or so that could be fraudulent for thoughtful consideration by a human. One worker and a computer system can thus do what PayPal would have had to hire 1,000 workers to do a generation ago. Given that the computer system does not need things like food, that thousand-fold increase in productivity will redound entirely to the benefit of the middle class.

      Put another way, globalization lowered the wages of low-skill advanced-country workers because others would perform their jobs more cheaply, and then consume the value that they had created. Computers mean that higher-skill workers - and the lower-skill workers who remain to oversee the large robotic factories and warehouses - can spend their time on more valuable activities, assisted by computers that demand little.

      Thiel's argument may be correct. But it is far from airtight.

      In fact, Thiel seems to be running into the old diamonds-and-water paradox - water is essential, but costs nothing, whereas diamonds are virtually useless, but extremely expensive - albeit in a sophisticated and subtle way. The paradox exists because, in a market economy, the value of water is set not by the total usefulness of water (infinite) or by the average usefulness of water (very large), but by the marginal value of the last drop of water consumed (very low).

      Similarly, the wages and salaries of low- and high-skill workers in the robot-computer economy of the future will not be determined by the (very high) productivity of the one lower-skill worker ensuring that all of the robots are in their places or the one high-skill worker reprogramming the software. Instead, compensation will reflect what workers outside the highly productive computer-robot economy are creating and earning.

      The newly industrialized city of Manchester had the highest level of labor productivity the world had ever seen. But the factory workers' wages were set not by their extraordinary productivity, but by what they would earn if they returned to the potato fields of pre-famine Ireland.

      So the question is not whether robots and computers will make human labor in the goods, high-tech services, and information-producing sectors infinitely more productive. They will. What really matters is whether the jobs outside of the robot-computer economy - jobs involving people's mouths, smiles, and minds - remain valuable and in high demand.

      From 1850 to 1970 or so, rapid technological progress first triggered wage increases in line with productivity gains. Then came the protracted process of income-distribution equalization, as machines, installed to substitute for human legs, and fingers created more jobs in machine-minding, which used human brains and mouths, than it destroyed in sectors requiring routine muscle power or dexterity work. And rising real incomes increased leisure time, thereby boosting demand for smiles and the products of minds.

      Will the same occur when machines take over routine brainwork? Maybe. But it is far from being a safe bet on which to rest an entire argument, as Thiel has.

      The author  J. Bradford DeLong is a former deputy assistant secretary of the US Treasury.

      Comments (0)
      Most popular in 24h
        Archived Content
      Media partners:

      Copyright ©1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
      Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

      主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧洲精品成人免费视频在线观看 | 亚洲国产成人爱av在线播放| 亚洲人成黄网在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区免费| 免费大黄网站在线观看| 国产成人综合亚洲绿色| 国产精品无码免费视频二三区 | 18女人腿打开无遮掩免费| 亚洲国产精品无码久久SM| 一级毛片免费播放试看60分钟| 久久亚洲精品无码播放| 国产一级黄片儿免费看| 亚洲av无码无在线观看红杏| 亚洲免费视频在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久下载| 国产精品成人免费福利| 亚洲色在线无码国产精品不卡| 国产免费av片在线看| 精品久久亚洲一级α| 亚洲一区无码精品色| 久久伊人免费视频| 亚洲va成无码人在线观看| 日本免费中文字幕在线看| a一级爱做片免费| 亚洲精品无码不卡| 成年18网站免费视频网站| 久久久久久a亚洲欧洲AV| 精品久久8x国产免费观看| 亚洲啪AV永久无码精品放毛片| 亚洲成a人一区二区三区| 中文字幕乱码一区二区免费| 亚洲免费中文字幕| 国产一级做a爱免费视频| 在线播放免费人成毛片乱码| 2019亚洲午夜无码天堂| 亚洲精品一级无码中文字幕| 精品无码国产污污污免费网站| 亚洲乱码无人区卡1卡2卡3| 亚洲一级特黄大片在线观看| 免费能直接在线观看黄的视频 | 成av免费大片黄在线观看|