1. LINE

      Text:AAAPrint
      Society

      Government backs plaintiffs in Harvard lawsuit

      1
      2018-09-01 10:30:16China Daily Editor : Feng Shuang ECNS App Download

      The US Department of Justice, questioning Harvard University's use of race as a criterion in its admissions process on Thursday, supporting Asian-American applicants suing the Ivy League school for discrimination.

      By filing a statement of interest, the department supported the claim made by the plaintiff, Students for Fair Admissions, that Harvard has been intentionally and systematically discriminating against Asian-Americans by elevating the standard for their admission and limiting the number who get accepted.

      The statement of interest said the university "has failed to carry its demanding burden to show that its use of race does not inflict unlawful racial discrimination on Asian-Americans".

      With some of its Asian-American members denied admission to Harvard, the student organization filed the lawsuit against Harvard in US District Court in Boston, Massachusetts, in 2014.

      "The record evidence demonstrates that Harvard's race-based admissions process significantly disadvantages Asian-American applicants compared to applicants of other racial groups," the Justice Department wrote in the filling.

      The filing said that Harvard "uses a vague 'personal rating 'that harms Asian-American applicants' chances for admission and may be infected with racial bias; engages in unlawful racial balancing; and has never seriously considered race-neutral alternatives in its more than 45 years of using race to make admissions decisions."

      The rating system has resulted in Asian-American applicants on average scoring lower than white applicants, which was counter to the diversity goals of Harvard, the plaintiffs said.

      Associated with Harvard's diversity target was its efforts to monitor and manipulate the racial makeup of the incoming class, the Justice Departments said. Asian-Americans, for example, comprised 20 percent of admissions in two consecutive years.

      Such practices, defined by the Justice Department as attempts to "racially balance" the makeup of a student body, are "patently unconstitutional" the filing said.

      "No American should be denied admission to school because of their race. As a recipient of taxpayer dollars, Harvard has a responsibility to conduct its admissions policy without racial discrimination by using meaningful admissions criteria that meet lawful requirements," Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement.

      Harvard on Thursday responded by saying it was "deeply disappointed" by the Justice Department's decision and criticized the arguments as "misleading and hollow".

      The case has drawn wide attention to how race and the pursuit of diversity factor into universities' admissions processes but also is seen as a reading on the government's attitude toward affirmative action.

      In support of Harvard, a group of students and alumni filed a brief in July in which they condemned the lawsuit as an attempt to "dismantle efforts to create a racially diverse and inclusive student body through college admissions".

      Harvard also got support from 16 other US universities, which also filed a brief last month, echoing Harvard's stance that diversity of the student body is essential to achieving educational missions.

      The case is scheduled to go to trial in October.

        

      Related news

      MorePhoto

      Most popular in 24h

      MoreTop news

      MoreVideo

      News
      Politics
      Business
      Society
      Culture
      Military
      Sci-tech
      Entertainment
      Sports
      Odd
      Features
      Biz
      Economy
      Travel
      Travel News
      Travel Types
      Events
      Food
      Hotel
      Bar & Club
      Architecture
      Gallery
      Photo
      CNS Photo
      Video
      Video
      Learning Chinese
      Learn About China
      Social Chinese
      Business Chinese
      Buzz Words
      Bilingual
      Resources
      ECNS Wire
      Special Coverage
      Infographics
      Voices
      LINE
      Back to top Links | About Us | Jobs | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
      Copyright ?1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
      Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
      主站蜘蛛池模板: 性xxxxx免费视频播放| 最好看的中文字幕2019免费| 日韩精品无码免费专区午夜不卡| 不卡视频免费在线观看| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看| 免费av欧美国产在钱| 免费人成视频在线观看视频| 亚洲人成网7777777国产| 777亚洲精品乱码久久久久久| 亚洲粉嫩美白在线| 日韩大片免费观看视频播放| 中文字幕免费观看视频| 国产妇乱子伦视频免费| 国产伦精品一区二区三区免费迷| 最新精品亚洲成a人在线观看| 亚洲高清视频免费| 亚洲AV色无码乱码在线观看| 伊人久久大香线蕉免费视频| 免费三级毛片电影片| jlzzjlzz亚洲乱熟在线播放| 亚洲美免无码中文字幕在线| 精品国产亚洲AV麻豆| 国产三级在线免费| 午夜视频免费观看| 国产亚洲综合色就色| 亚洲熟妇无码一区二区三区 | 亚洲成熟xxxxx电影| 在线aⅴ亚洲中文字幕| 国产久爱免费精品视频 | 国产h肉在线视频免费观看| 亚洲AV无码乱码在线观看性色扶 | 日韩插啊免费视频在线观看| 天天摸夜夜摸成人免费视频| 国产亚洲成av人片在线观看| 亚洲色偷偷偷综合网| 在线免费观看h片| 精品免费国产一区二区三区| 久久亚洲AV无码精品色午夜麻| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区狼人影院 | 最新69国产成人精品免费视频动漫| 亚洲中文久久精品无码|