1. LINE

      Text:AAAPrint
      Politics

      South China Sea Arbitration initiated by the Philippines widely refuted

      1
      2016-04-18 08:43Xinhua Editor: Gu Liping

      Both foreign and Chinese experts questioned and refuted the Philippines' standing on the South China Sea issue at a seminar that closed on Sunday in central China's Wuhan City.

      Manila filed a case with the tribunal that arbitrates maritime disputes under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) on April 3.

      However, China has legitimate rights under international law to reject the arbitration, unilaterally initiated by the Philippines, as the UN tribunal has no jurisdiction over Manila's territorial claims to several islands, rocks, shoals and other land features across the South China Sea.

      In addition, when ratifying the UNCLOS in 2006, China had the right to opt out of various aspects. One of these was compulsory arbitration of maritime boundary delimitations and historical rights by the tribunal.

      The International Seminar on the Application of Compulsory Procedures under the Convention on the Law of the Sea to the South China Sea Arbitration initiated by the Philippines, discussed topics including the nature of the dispute, historic rights and maritime features.

      More than 30 scholars and experts from Austria, Canada, the Republic of Korea, Switzerland, Britain, and the Chinese mainland and Taiwan attended the seminar.

      Dean of the China Institute of Boundary and Ocean Studies at Wuhan University Hu Dekun said the origin and nature of the South China Sea dispute was the Philippines' illegal occupation of the Chinese islands and reefs, thus, he called on international law scholars to consider the South China Sea Arbitration in compliance with history and facts.

      Hu shared how Chinese people first discovered and used the South China Sea islands, and how successive Chinese governments have enjoyed the sovereignty and have been exercising jurisdiction over the South China Sea islands for a long period of time.

      Xiao Jianguo, deputy director general of the department of boundary and ocean affairs, under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, restated China's position on the issue, namely, non-acceptance, non-participation, non-recognition and non-implementation.

      Xiao said the Philippines' unilateral arbitration was not a simple legal case, but political provocation under the cloak of law, which has gravely hindered mutual political understanding between the two sides, and constitutes a serious threat to regional cooperation.

      Gao Zhiguo, a judge with the International Tribunal on the Law of Sea and a researcher with the China Institute for Marine Affairs under the State Oceanic Administration, said the current arbitration has failed to reach the goal of settling disputes and proposing solutions.

      Gao said the tribunal had deviated from a just and objective stance due to the apparent bias in favor of the Philippines.

      Thomas Cottier, professor at the University of Bern, Switzerland, said the exclusive economic zone delimited by China does not impede freedom of navigation in the region.

      He said China's non-acceptance and non-participation position is understandable, as the case is not simply a legal dispute, but involves political factors, and the arbitration initiated by the Philippines is unable to solve the dispute.

      Fu Kuncheng, director of Xiamen University's South China Sea Institute, said the essence of the case is sovereignty and delimitation, adding that China should step up the research and expounding of its historic rights, which does not come into conflict with the statutory rights given by conventions.

      Hyun-soo Kim, professor at Inha University in Republic of Korea, said China and the Philippines should try to settle the dispute through negotiation.

      Kim said the Declaration on the Code of Conduct on the South China Sea, signed by China and ASEAN, could the legal framework for the settlement of the issue.

      The two-day seminar was hosted by the Collaborative Innovation Center for Territorial Sovereignty and Maritime Rights and Wuhan University China Institute of Boundary and Ocean Studies.

      Related:

        

      Related news

      MorePhoto

      Most popular in 24h

      MoreTop news

      MoreVideo

      News
      Politics
      Business
      Society
      Culture
      Military
      Sci-tech
      Entertainment
      Sports
      Odd
      Features
      Biz
      Economy
      Travel
      Travel News
      Travel Types
      Events
      Food
      Hotel
      Bar & Club
      Architecture
      Gallery
      Photo
      CNS Photo
      Video
      Video
      Learning Chinese
      Learn About China
      Social Chinese
      Business Chinese
      Buzz Words
      Bilingual
      Resources
      ECNS Wire
      Special Coverage
      Infographics
      Voices
      LINE
      Back to top Links | About Us | Jobs | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
      Copyright ©1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
      Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
      主站蜘蛛池模板: 性色av免费观看| 久久亚洲美女精品国产精品| 中国国语毛片免费观看视频| 亚洲成AV人片在线观看| 成年黄网站色大免费全看| 女bbbbxxxx另类亚洲| 久久精品夜色国产亚洲av| 成年女人喷潮毛片免费播放| 一个人免费观看视频在线中文 | 亚洲理论精品午夜电影| 日本a级片免费看| 国产一级婬片A视频免费观看| 亚洲1234区乱码| 亚洲日本va在线视频观看| 中国在线观看免费高清完整版| 一级中文字幕乱码免费| 精品亚洲AV无码一区二区 | 亚洲一区二区三区丝袜| 亚洲国产精品成人久久| 国产精品公开免费视频| 日韩精品人妻系列无码专区免费| 亚洲av无码日韩av无码网站冲| 久久精品a亚洲国产v高清不卡 | 久久亚洲国产视频| 免费人成年激情视频在线观看| 日本zzzzwww大片免费| 中文字幕免费观看视频| 亚洲精品色播一区二区| 亚洲网红精品大秀在线观看| 精品亚洲一区二区三区在线播放 | 国产精品视频免费一区二区三区| 99爱视频99爱在线观看免费| 四虎影视久久久免费| 亚洲欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 亚洲AV无码乱码在线观看| 国产h视频在线观看免费| 91视频免费网址| a级特黄毛片免费观看| 一级毛片视频免费| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区在线播放| 亚洲高清视频在线播放|